Kim Oliveros
Neil de la Cruz
Rocelie Delfin
Kim Oliveros
Neil de la Cruz
Rocelie Delfin
LES AMACIO
When Did You Arrive?

Arrival is never singular. It is layered, haunted by the steps that came before and the distances
that remain ahead. To arrive is to declare presence, yet it is also to carry the invisible weight of
displacement, of exile, of the long road that does not end at the door.
The question “When did you arrive?” appears simple, but it unsettles. It can be asked in curiosity, but also in suspicion. It marks the stranger, the migrant, the newcomer, the one who does not yet belong. It echoes in airports, in borders, in towns where accents betray origins, in rooms where histories are erased. To be asked when you arrived is also to be reminded that your presence is provisional, that recognition is conditional, that belonging is something you must prove again and again.
These works dwell in that fragile terrain. They speak of thresholds crossed and yet uncrossed, of homes left behind and homes not yet found. Textures emerge like scars of journey, colors fold into one another like overlapping geographies, and forms seem suspended between exile and return. Arrival here is not an endpoint but a restless negotiation with visibility and erasure.
And hope — what of hope ? Hope accompanies every departure, every crossing, every act of
return. Yet here it is interrogated. What kind of hope is it that fuels migration? The hope of better lives, of freedom, of futures still unwritten. But also the fragile hope of being welcomed, of being seen as equal, of being allowed to stay. Too often, hope is tested, bruised, deferred. Entire generations live in the waiting room of hope, suspended between what was left and what has not yet arrived.
Still, hope persists, though it is no longer innocent. It is carried like contraband in memory, like a hidden seed in the folds of clothing. It is fragile, but it survives in acts of making, in the courage to step again into spaces that once excluded, in the quiet refusal to vanish. These works bear witness to that survival—hope that is fractured yet luminous, a hope that knows the pain of disappointment yet continues to breathe.
“When Did You Arrive?” is also a question of intimacy. It asks when we entered each other’s lives, when we allowed ourselves to be vulnerable, when we recognized ourselves in another’s story. Arrival is not only about geography—it is about the heart, about the thresholds of trust and tenderness.
This exhibition becomes a gathering of such thresholds. It refuses the idea of arrival as
completion and instead lingers in the fragile in-between: between exile and return, between
estrangement and belonging, between despair and hope. It asks viewers not only to witness
these arrivals but to reflect on their own. When did you arrive at who you are now? When did youlose hope, and when did it return? When will you arrive again?
​
-Les Amacio
GARRYLOID POMOY
For whatever purpose it may serve

In For whatever purpose it may serve, Garryloid Pomoy returns to the lexicon of tailoring and sewing, rendering its implements as still lifes stripped of sentimentality. The exhibition focuses its gaze on sewing kits—those intimate constellations of threads still lodged in needle eyes, tape measures slackened by use, wound laces, spare buttons, and waiting scissors. Typically housed in repurposed cookie tins, these tools are summoned for acts of repair: to close a tear, fasten what has come loose, restore what has frayed.
Pomoy paints them not as neutral objects but as indices of their owners, a form of objectified self-portraiture, made more intimate by the fact that these kits belong to those closest to him. A pin cushion punctured with real needles and threaded pins unsettles the boundary between representation and thing, collapsing the distance between subject and object, signifier and signified.
Much of Pomoy’s recent practice has drawn from the working tools of his mother—most notably her sewing machine—now transformed into motifs of recollection. Following her passing, what remains is an archive of objects and the memories they carry. These paintings function both as acts of mourning and gestures of keeping: reminders that the living are often recalled through what they leave behind, and that objects can ignite remembrance long after hands have abandoned them. Each brushstroke behaves like a stitch, binding fragments of memory to the surface of the canvas.
The exhibition’s title gestures toward the mutable lives of things and the roles they assume within ours. Whether objects serve to manage the everyday, to accrue beauty, or to hold meaning, they are never inert. For whatever purpose it may serve lingers in this space of use and after-use, inviting viewers to dwell in the quiet labor of meaning-making—where function gives way to memory, and the ordinary becomes a site of care, loss, and continuance.
-Carlomar Arcangel Daoana
DZEN SALINGA
"From Where I Stand"

Dzen Salinga’s Solo exhibit “From where I stand” is an exploration of perception,
malice, and understanding. In literal meaning the show title is humoring a thought of contradiction, opposing the very idea and purpose of the subject in the paintings, -Chairs.
Salinga used a variety of chair/couch cut-outs as unconventional viewfinder, encapsulating images that have the same properties, changing only its appearance to impersonate a new one. By doing so, she limits and controls the vision of the naked eye while on the other hand expanding its meaning, tickling the brain to transform simple objects into a paradox of things, opening an end that brings out questions and personal opinions to the table.
When do we start seeing more than what it seems?
What’s triggering us to dig more?
Perhaps an experience? Familiarity?
“From where I stand” is a subjective battlefield, but as they say, to each their own.
​
-Dzen Salinga